AIMS Advisory helps organisations put practical, credible governance around their AI — so they can use it with confidence, and prove it to the people who ask.
Who this is for
Your organisation is using AI. Who's accountable when something goes wrong? Boards are asking this question more often — and regulators are starting to too.
The EU AI Act is live. Australian frameworks are developing. Enterprise procurement is starting to ask for AI governance evidence. Your frameworks need to catch up.
You're building with AI or deploying vendor tools. Governance doesn't slow you down — a well-designed AIMS gives teams clarity on what's acceptable and why.
Why AI Governance
Most organisations are deploying AI tools faster than they're thinking about the risks. That gap — between use and governance — is where problems accumulate.
AI introduces risks that don't show up in existing frameworks: biased outputs, data leakage into third-party models, decisions you can't explain. Governance makes them visible before they become incidents.
Risk & ComplianceEnterprise buyers, government agencies, and insurers are starting to ask: "How do you govern your AI?" A certified management system is a credible, auditable answer — not just a policy document.
Board & C-SuiteThe EU AI Act is in force. Australia is developing its own framework. ISO 42001 is already being referenced in procurement. Getting organised now costs far less than responding to a regulatory demand later.
All AudiencesWhat data can staff put into ChatGPT? Who decides whether to deploy a new AI tool? Without clear policies, teams either avoid AI or use it in ways that create risk. Good governance removes the ambiguity.
Tech & ProductOrganisations with mature AI governance move faster — not slower. Clearer criteria for AI adoption, faster procurement cycles, stronger customer confidence. Governance is an enabler, not a brake.
Board & C-SuiteYour AI use will grow. Starting with a well-designed management system means you're building on something solid — not retrofitting controls onto a mess of ad hoc decisions made under pressure.
Tech & ProductISO/IEC 42001
ISO 42001 is a management system standard — a structured framework for how your organisation governs something. In this case: AI.
It doesn't tell you which AI tools to use, or how to build models. It defines how you make decisions about AI — who's responsible, how risks are assessed, how systems are monitored, and how you improve over time.
Think of it like ISO 27001 (information security) — except built for the specific challenges AI brings: bias, explainability, data quality, third-party model risk, and societal impact.
How It Works
ISO 42001 implementation doesn't mean months of workshops and binders of documents. The goal is a management system that actually works — not one that exists to satisfy auditors.
Map your current AI use, existing policies, and governance gaps against ISO 42001 requirements. Clear picture, no jargon.
Build an AI management system proportionate to your organisation — not a copy-paste of what a multinational would do. Practical, not performative.
Embed policies, processes and controls with your people — so the system is understood and owned internally, not just documented.
Whether you're pursuing certification or just need a defensible framework, we get you to a point where you can answer any question confidently.
Ask Paladin™
Not sure where to start? Ask your question below and Mike will respond personally — no automated replies, no sales pitch. Just a straight answer from someone who knows this space.
Every question goes directly to Mike. He typically responds within one business day. There's no commitment involved — just a conversation.
The Practice
AIMS Advisory exists because most organisations are deploying AI faster than they're thinking about the consequences — and the gap between the two is where real risk accumulates.
I spent six years as CISO at Macquarie Bank and three years advising customer CISOs at AWS — the kind of organisations now adopting ISO 42001 at scale. I've built governance frameworks under regulatory pressure, presented to boards, and helped leadership teams get clarity on risks they couldn't yet see clearly. That's the experience I bring to every engagement.
The practice is deliberately small. You work directly with a principal consultant, not a team of people who've never seen your industry. Every engagement starts with understanding your actual situation: what AI you're using, who's asking hard questions about it, and what you genuinely need.
Governance done well isn't bureaucracy. It's clarity — for your teams, your customers, your board, and your regulators. Use Paladin above to explore your questions, or reach out directly.
Principal